About TheInterregnum

[Placeholder — replace with a clear mission statement describing why the organization exists and who it serves]

Mission

[Mission statement placeholder]

Trust & Ethics

[Outline editorial standards, correction policy, anonymous sources handling — placeholder]

Ownership & Funding

[Describe ownership, funding sources, and potential conflicts of interest — placeholder]

The Team

[List editorial leadership and staff. For each: name, title, short bio, photo path, contact — placeholders]

History & Impact

[Origin story, notable achievements, and community impact — placeholder]

Contact & Submissions

[Office address: placeholder]

[Email: info@example.com — placeholder]

[Freelancer submission instructions and portfolio link — placeholder]

Editor Notes

[End of placeholders — replace each bracketed item with real content]

TheInterregnum — About

About The_Interregnum

The Interregnum is a serial analysis of systemic crisis, investigating the decomposition of the post-1945 world order and the violent scramble to impose a new one.

Our Mission

Our Mission The Interregnum is an independent media project tracking the collapse of the post-1945 world order and the scramble to replace it. We publish serial, evidence-first investigations into the material infrastructures—energy grids, payment rails, data cables, logistics corridors, care regimes—that now function as the main battlegrounds of global crisis. We start from the premise that the liberal-capitalist compact (mass consumption + welfare states + rules-based global governance) has exhausted itself. What follows is neither transition nor restoration, but a prolonged interregnum in which “the old is dying and the new cannot be born.”

Our job is to map that vacuum. Working in the updated tradition of world-systems analysis, we treat debt as the tribute mechanism of financialised empire, data as its behavioural surplus, and rare-earth mines as its new strategic chokepoints. We begin from the Global South and extraction periphery—where imperial techniques are road-tested before being repatriated to the core. We practise intellectual realism: no techno-solutionism, no multilateral wishful thinking, no populist shortcuts. Yet we preserve the possibility of politics—the insistence that collective agency remains decisive even in conditions of radical unfreedom.

Why Independent Media? Corporate outlets treat systemic breakdown as a series of discrete crises; state media weaponise them for nationalist narratives. Neither is equipped to follow the money, the data, or the supply routes across borders, asset classes, and protocol layers. Independence means: No advertisers, no investors, no paywall Open-access under Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Transparent funding: reader subscriptions cover hosting and research costs only Editorial autonomy: we choose our topics, sources, and conclusions Editorial Policy Serial form: Each instalment stands alone while advancing a cumulative argument—read in any order, but read together. Evidence-first: Satellite imagery, central-bank balance sheets, port throughput statistics and leaked trade documents are our raw material. Peripheral vantage: We start from extraction zones—mines, Special Economic Zones, migrant corridors—where the future is beta-tested. Open access: Translate, repost, remix—just credit and share alike. Current Series The Interregnum (2026) – Systemic decomposition analysed through energy, debt, AI, and platform militarisation The Digital Battlefield (2026) – How states weaponise platform infrastructure to dismantle other states (Further instalments on logistics sovereignty, asset-price states, and climate-proof enclaves in development)

Editorial Team

Contact

Provide contact details or a contact form link.

Feel free to edit this page to add images, bios, or other information.